« Payday Challenge #3: Get Drunk For Cheap | Main | Not Fortune Telling, Just Good Sense »

We Beat The Big Dogs

We Beat The Big Dogs
source: Getty Images

This is just a quick entry to convey one message. Our Core Model Portfolio is likely beating the pants off of your mutual fund! As the chart below shows, the Core Model Portfolio has consistently outperformed the major indexes and the typical mutual fund over the last one, three, and five years as well as since the inception (12/6/2002) of the Core Model Portfolio. But the chart understates the degree to which our portfolio outperformed relative to mutual funds because the costs of owning the funds have not been considered in the returns. (Click chart or here for larger image.)

Core Portfolio Returns
source: Foliofn.com, Standard & Poors, Wilshire, Wall Street Journal. Disclosure.

Correction: The annualized 3-year return ending 12/31/2010 for the Core Model Portfolio is actually 3.55% making the "Margin of Victory" for that time period 5.76%.

I do not want to make this post too lengthy. I plan on talking about the costs of mutual fund ownership in later posts. (It’s a topic deserving some attention.) 

Let me just summarize by saying studies have shown, when commissions, brokerage fees, marketing fees, redemption fees, taxes and the like are considered, the typical load mutual fund costs somewhere in excess of 4% - 6% of your assets. Although less offensive, a no-load fund costs somewhere between 3% - 5%. Let’s call it a cool 4.5%.

Think about that for a moment. Since our portfolio’s inception in December of 2002, the typical mutual fund (probably the one in your 401k or IRA) has returned 6.8% per year. However, it has cost you 4.5% to own that fund leaving only 2.3% in returns. In other words, the mutual fund kept 66% of the returns for itself.

Our portfolio, on the other hand, has returned 12.3% over the same period and cost our investors 1.5% - 2% making our margin of victory over mutual funds greater than the above chart illustrates. Our returns net of fees are about 10.8% for most of our clients while the typical mutual fund returned 2.3% net of fees. It’s no contest.

Do not get me wrong. I am not saying don’t invest in mutual funds. Mutual funds are still a great option given the landscape of choices the average investor has. It’s better than a CD, a savings account or your mattress. But what I am saying is most investors can do better than a mutual fund. Excuse our obvious self-promotion but one great example is our portfolio.

 Subscribe by: Email or RSS | Email this Email | Print This Print |


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Subscribe with: 

Subscribe in a readerSubscribe By Email:
-- subscribe to get updated headlines and full length posts delivered right to your email address.

or subscribe by:

Reader | RSS

About Brick Financial Management, LLC

Blogged by Brick Financial

51 JFK Pkwy, 1st Fl. West
Short Hills, NJ 07078
Email Us

Brick Financial Management, LLC is a Registered Investment Advisor specializing in providing investment management services to individuals, families, organizations and institutions. We implement highly focused stock, bond, and balanced portfolios using an investment approach commonly referred to as value investing. Disclosure


ShareThis -- ShareThis lets you instantly access all of your profiles, blogs, friends, and contacts for easy sharing and updating on sites like Digg, Delicious, Reddit, Facebook and MySpace. For more about ShareThis, click here.

Digg! Digg -- submit this item to be shared and voted on by the digg community. For more about digg, click here.

Delicious Del.icio.us -- mark an item as a favorite to access later or share with the del.icio.us community. For more about del.icio.us, click here.

Facebook Facebook -- share an item with users of Facebook, a collection of school, company and regional social networks. For more about Facebook, click here.

Ben's Latest Tweet

    Follow Ben on Twitter